• If you ask me, why I am a Catholic Christian, my answer would be like the one of Saint Augustine’s: “I won’t be a Christian if not for the Catholic Church”.

  • An analysis of how the NT expands upon an OT monotheistic text In order to include Jesus within God’s unique identity

  • Question: The Bible, specifically Paul, says there is only one God and that is the Father (cf. 1 Corinthians 8:6; Ephesians 4:6; 1 Timothy 2:5). Since Trinitarians believe that Jesus is not the Father, this means that Jesus is not God. Answer: Paul is no more denying the fact that the Lord Jesus is God…

  • “Your throne is established from of old; You are from everlasting.” Psalm 93:2

  • The following citation is from Luther’s On the Conception of the Mother of God, AD 1527: “The conception, namely the infusion of the soul, is believed to have taken place gently and blessedly, without original sin coming upon her; so that in the infusion of the soul she was also at the same time purified from…

  • The following quotation is courtesy of William Albrecht. It is from a letter that Martin Luther wrote in the final years of his life, and provides further confirmation that this leading reformer held to the perpetual virginity of Mary. Luther even claims that this doctrine is based on inspired Scripture, and not merely on sacred…

  • There are four places in the inspired OT writings where the one true God employs plural pronouns to describe himself: “Then God said, ‘Let US make man in OUR image, after OUR likeness; and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the birds of the air, and over the cattle,…

  • The thread running through nearly every conversion story is the same: authority, the Eucharist, and Church history. When pastors begin to read the early Church Fathers with honest hearts, they consistently find themselves walking toward Rome.

  • Where it is stated (of the Messianic King in Ps. 72:5): LET THEM FEAR YOU AS LONG AS THE SUN ENDURES AND AS LONG AS THE MOON, A GENERATION AND GENERATIONS.

  • Who has ever heard of such a thing? Who has ever seen such a thing? In the beginning, the intention of Ha-Kadosh Barukh Hu was to divert Israel to the desert for six months, from Nisan to Tishrei. But when He contemplated the suffering of the Messiah during all those years, immediately, suddenly, He will…

  • In the year 268 AD, a provincial council was convened at Antioch, Syria where the Apostles of the risen Lord often frequented and where believers were first called Christians: “Then departed Barnabas to Tarsus, for to seek Saul: and when he had found him, he brought him unto Antioch. And it came to pass, that a…

  • The following is adapted from this post: Creed of the Antioch Council of 325. All emphasis will be mine. 8. Ἔστιν οὖν ἡ πίστις, ἣ προετέθη ὑπ’ ἀνδρῶν, πνευματικῶν καὶ οὺς αὖθις οὐ δίκαιον νομίφειν κατὰ σάρκα τῆν ἢ νοεῖν, ἀλλὰ ἐν πνεύματι ταῖς τῶν θεοπνεύστων βιβλίων ἁγίαις γραφαῖς συνησκῆσθαι, ἥδε· πιστεύειν εἰς ἕνα θεὸν πατέρα παντοκράτορα,…

  • In this article I will present more evidence in support of Mary’s perpetual virginity by showing how the Lord God made her womb the holy of holies for Christ to dwell in all his fullness. THE HIGH PRIEST AND THE HOLY OF HOLIES The God-breathed Scriptures affirm that the high priest alone was authorized to…

  • Jesus forgives sins, only God forgives sins, that means Jesus is God!

  • In this post I am going to employ the interpretive method, which unitarians apply to Scripture to undermine Christ’s Deity, against them. I will show how their approach in attacking Christ’s divinity can be used to prove that the Father cannot be the true God, since only the Son is.     UNITARIAN PROOFTEXTS Anti-Trinitarians often…

  • In this post I will cite from a few of the early Christian writers who viewed Mary as the new Eve, just as Christ was the new Adam, who through her obedience undid what Eve’s disobedience did to creation. JUSTIN MARTYR Chapter 100. In what sense Christ is [called] Jacob, and Israel, and Son of…

  • Luke records the words the angel Gabriel uttered to the holy Mother of Christ as he came to announce the glorious and blessed Incarnation of our Lord:   “And he came to her and said, ‘Hail (Chaire), full of grace (kecharitomene), the Lord is with you!’” Luke 1:28   The word Chaire appears four other…

  • In this post I will present evidence from the epistle of Jude showing that this inspired author believed that Jesus is YHWH God Almighty who became flesh.   THE GOD OF THE SHEMA The inspired letter begins with Jude describing himself as the servant/slave of the risen Jesus and then goes on to identify Christ…

  • ungodly persons who turn the grace of our God into sensuality and who deny our ONLY Master and Lord, Jesus Christ (ton MONON despoten kai kyrion hemon ‘Iesoun Christon).” Jude 1:4

  • And there is one Lord, Jesus Christ (heis Kyrios ‘Iesous Christos), by whom everything exists, and by whom we ourselves are alive.” 1 Corinthians 8:6

  • “Yahweh, your Redeemer, and he who formed you from the womb says: “I am Yahweh, who makes all things; who ALONE stretches out the heavens; who spreads out the earth BY MYSELF;” Isaiah 44:24

  • “Hear, O Israel! Yahweh is our God, Yahweh is one!” Deuteronomy 6:4

  • The Pope’s authority over other bishops is real, direct, and juridical, not merely honorary, because it belongs to the very constitution of the Church willed by Christ. At the same time, it is ordered to communion and the safeguarding of the faith, not to arbitrary domination. 1) The foundation: why the Pope can discipline bishops…

  • The tactic that schismatics started using was, (Pope of Rome, Roman Catholic etc.), and that’s misleading!

  • Prophet or tool of the devil?

  • In this post I will be referencing the late Protestant scholar J. B. Lightfoot’s monumental work on the early church’s view of the blessed Mother’s virginity. All bold and capital emphasis will be mine. Lightfoot did a careful, painstaking analysis of the early Christians writings, examining the extant sources from the first century and up…

  • At the Council of Ephesus (431 AD), the blessed St. Cyril of Alexandria uttered a litany of praise to the blessed Mother of our God Incarnate in honor of her being the holy and pure God-bearer. Here’s what this holy servant of Christ wrote: “Mary, Mother of God, we salute you. Precious vessel, worthy of…

  • The statements cited here are taken from For the Life of the World: Toward A Social Ethos of the Orthodox Church, published by Holy Cross Orthodox Press in 2020. The document can be accessed at the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America website: Social Ethos Document. Here is the PDF Version. The readers will see that…

  • The Catholic Church says in ccc841 that Muslims (profess) to worship the God of Abraham and together with us worship one God, creator and merciful judge etc. The Catholic Church doesn’t say things like the east are saying. Orthodox say that us and Muslims worship the same God.

  • The Catholic Church says in ccc841 that Muslims (profess) to worship the God of Abraham and together with us worship one God, creator and merciful judge etc. The Catholic Church doesn’t say things like the east are saying. Orthodox say that us and Muslims worship the same God.

  • “But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, Though you are little among the thousands of Judah, Yet out of you shall come forth to Me The One to be Ruler in Israel, Whose goings forth are from of old (miqqedem), From everlasting (olam).” Micah 5:2

  • “The blessed Peter, the chosen, the preeminent, the first among the disciples, for whom alone with himself the Savior paid the tribute [Matt. 17:27], quickly g.asped and understood their meaning. And what does he say? ‘Behold, we have left all and have followed you’ [Matt. 19:27; Mark 10:28]” [A.D. 200]).

  • Christianity Trinity Church History Gospel Jesus Christ

  • After the martyrdom of Paul and of Peter, Linus was the first to obtain the episcopate of the church at Rome. Paul mentions him, when writing to Timothy from Rome

  • How, then, can it be asserted that there once was a time when He was not the Son?

  • Origen affirms that Jesus Christ is the uncreated firstborn Son of God

  • The following excerpts are from Origen’s Commentary on the Gospel of John.

  • In this post, I will be citing the exegesis of Protestant expositors in regards to the language employed by Luke in recording the annunciation of, and subsequent reactions to, Jesus’ virginal conception. It has long been noted that Luke describes this miraculous event in a way that is strikingly reminiscent to the manner the Hebrew…

  • The information posted here is uploaded from the following article: The original papyrus fragment.   In 1917, a stunning treasure came to the John Rylands Library in Manchester, England. It was a piece of papyrus, Egyptian in origin.   On this fragment, in Greek, is inscribed a hymn to Mary, called in Latin Sub Tuum Praesidium,…

  • The very last writing of St. Augustine was the Opus Imperfectum contra Julianum, literally, the “Unfinished Work Against Julian.” The name itself tells the whole story. What was it? Augustine wrote this work in the closing years of a life occupied with three great controversies, Manichaeism, Donatism, and Pelagianism the last of which ended with…

  • WHAT Although there were always a few dissenters, for the first one thousand years of the Church there was a broad consensus among the Fathers on all the basic tenets of the faith, from Baptism to the Eucharist to the role of Tradition. As the most respected pastors and theologians of their day, the opinion…

  • A Response to Ibn Anwar’s Anti-Trinitarian “Examination of Mark 12:29-34” One of the scribes came and heard them arguing, and recognizing that He had answered them well, asked Him, “What commandment is the foremost of all?” 29 Jesus answered, “The foremost is, ‘HEAR, O ISRAEL! THE LORD OUR GOD IS ONE LORD; 30 AND YOU…

  • In this relatively short, post I will show from the Jehovah’s Witnesses’ own perverted Bible translation that the one true Creator God is Triune. I will be using the New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures (Study Edition). According to the Hebrew Bible, Jehovah created and gives life to all creation all by himself, without…

  • Arian polemicist Greg Stafford has made it a chief aim of his mission to do all he can to pervert the explicit biblical witness to the Son’s uncreated, eternal nature and existence. Yet in his misguided zeal he often makes claims that end up refuting him since his points actually prove that Christ is not…

  • The Greek word for “sent” in Romans 10:15 is apostalosin — and for St. Paul, unless one is sent with apostolic authority, one has no authority in the Church.

  • In this post I will cite the works of three intellectual and spiritual giants of the Faith to show how they interpreted Genesis 1:26-27, particularly verse, where God uses plural pronouns when speaking of making man in the image and likeness of God. The readers will see that these magnificent men of the Church took…

  • The teaching of the ancient Churches that Mary was made perfectly holy and kept absolutely pure is based on the necessary conclusion of what the Scriptures teach in respect to the holiness and purity of God. For instance, the Holy Bible is explicitly clear that nothing unclean and impure can dwell with God: “If I…

  • Since Jesus is God Incarnate! The inspired Scriptures teach that Yahweh alone is able to save people from their sins. The sacred writings further attest that Yahweh does so for his own name’s sake, and not for the sake of another, “You are My witnesses, says the Lord, and My servant whom I have chosen…

  • The first and most well-known command reads, “I am the LORD your God who rescued you from the land of Egypt, the place of your slavery. You must not have any other god but me.” (Exodus 20:2-3)

  • Sunday 03 May 2026 Why May is Called the Month of Mary 👑 May is dedicated to Mary because of her unique place in God’s plan and the Church’s ancient practice of honoring her with particular devotion during the spring season. The Historical RootsThe formal dedication of May to Mary emerged gradually over centuries, though…

  • Question: I can understand how God can hear and respond to millions of prayers said at the exact same time, because He is omniscient. But how can the Blessed Mother and the Saints, like St. Faustina, deal with it? They are human, like us, but in heaven rather than on earth. The blessed Mother especially,…

  • In this post I will quote what the official documents of the Catholic Church teach in respect to the world’s religions and how salvation is to be obtained. I begin with what Catechism of the Catholic Church says: The Church and non-Christians 839 “Those who have not yet received the Gospel are related to the People of…

  • Who, being in very nature God (hos en morphe theou hyperchon)

  • The following excerpt is taken from the monumental work titled The Incarnate Christ and His Critics: A Biblical Defense, authored by Robert M. Bowman Jr. & J. Ed Komoszewski, published by Kregel Academic, Grand Rapids, MI, in 2024, Part 3: The Name of Jesus: Jesus’ Divine Names, 24. Jesus as “God” in the Rest of the New…

  • The Old Testament prophet Malachi announced by the Holy Spirit (cf. 2 Pet. 1:20-21) that a time would come when all throughout the world the Gentiles would offer to God a pure sacrifice: “A son honors his father, and a servant his master. If then I am a father, where is my honor? And if…

  • In this post I will cite from both Martin Luther and John Calvin admitting that the Eucharist was viewed to be Christ’s propitiatory sacrifice by the Church universally, with Calvin virtually admitting that this has been the belief from time immemorial. Calvin even dared to claim that this was due to the work of Satan…

  • In this segment I will show how this renowned Bishop of Alexandria affirmed doctrines which directly contradict the beliefs of Calvinists, since Cyril taught the perpetual virginity of the blessed Mother, water baptismal regeneration, and that the eucharist is the body and blood of Christ. All emphasis will be mine. MARY’S PERPETUAL VIRGINITY 4. CHRIST…

  • I will be quoting the very church fathers, writers, theologians and/or apologists that Calvinists will often reference in order to mislead folks into thinking that these early Christians held to beliefs similar to their own. I will prove that these Calvinists are being inconsistent and/or dishonest in doing so since these very early authorities taught…

  • In this post I will use the case of Judas Iscariot to refute the Calvinistic doctrine of T.U.L.I.P.(1)by showing that the God-breathed Scriptures emphatically teach that Christ chose him for the express purpose of saving him, even though the Lord knew that he was a devil whom Satan would tempt to betray God’s uniquely begotten…

  • John Calvin saw a tension between his belief in God having freely, sovereignly decreed to save only the elect whom he would effectual bring to saving faith in Christ with those statements in Scripture that affirm God desiring, wanting, willing and calling all mankind to salvation in Christ. In order to resolve this contradiction with…

  • Table of Contents It is time again to show how the beliefs of some of the early church’s greatest scholars, theologians, apologists, philosophers, martyrs etc., directly conflict with Protestantism in general, and with Calvinism in particular.   In this segment, I will show how the views of both Augustine and John the Damascene contradict the…

  • Table of Contents 1 Chapter 5.— Against the Title of the Epistle of Manichæus In the following extract Augustine shows how the Gospels’ reliability rests on the authority of the Catholic Church and to, therefore, attack the Church is to undermine the veracity of the Gospels themselves. Here is what he wrote in refuting of…

  • The oldest extant written mention of the term Catholic, as applied to the Church, is found in one of the letters of the holy martyr St. Ignatius, who was a disciple of the Apostles and the Bishop of Rome: Chapter 8. Let nothing be done without the bishop See that you all follow the bishop, even…

  • Monepiscopacy, also called monarchical episcopate, refers to a single bishop chosen to preside and rule over the church with a college of presbyters and deacons. The evidence shows that this was an early and widespread practice of the universal church. In fact, a strong case can be made that this structure was already in place…

  • The following is taken from St. John Chrysostom’s Homily on St. Ignatius. All emphasis will be mine. 4. And I will speak of a fourth crown, arising for us out of this episcopate. What then is this? The fact that he was entrusted with our own native city. For it is a laborious thing indeed to have…

  • I will be quoting from the late Dr. Robert A. Morey’s The Trinity: Evidence and Issues, published by World Bible Publishers, Inc., Iowa Falls, IA, in 1996, Part IV: The New Testament Evidence, Chapter 17. God The Son. All emphasis will be mine.   The Blood of God   Be on guard for yourselves and…

  • I will be quoting from the late Dr. Robert A. Morey’s The Trinity: Evidence and Issues, published by World Bible Publishers, Inc., Iowa Falls, IA, in 1996, Part IV: The New Testament Evidence, Chapter 17. God The Son. All emphasis will be mine.   The Theophanies   We have already seen that in Old Testament…

  • The Council of Chalcedon is important in the history of Christianity, because it helped harmonize Saint Cyril of Alexandria’s Christology with the historical Christology of the West. These Christologies were identical during their day. The actual decree of Chalcedon that delineates the council’s Christology specifically quotes and parallels Cyril’s Christology and at one point, even his deposed…

  • Saint Cyril of Alexandria’s Christology is not terribly complicated. He taught that the person of God the Word assumed human essence, so that after this assumption (the incarnation) He had both a divine and human essence. Sometimes essence is called “substance” as it is in the Latin tradition and other times it is called “nature”…

  • 2 nd Century AD St. Clement of Alexandria (150-215 AD) “The believer through discipline divests himself of his passions and passes to the mansion better than the former one, passing through torments with repentance for post-baptismal sins. Although these punishments cease after purification, God’s righteousness allows for temporary suffering during expiation.” (Patres Groeci. IX, col.…

  • The following is taken from St. Irenaeus’ Adversus haereses, Book III. All emphasis will be mine. Chapter 3 A refutation of the heretics, from the fact that, in the various Churches, a perpetual succession of bishops was kept up. 1. It is within the power of all, therefore, in every Church, who may wish to see the truth,…

  • The following excerpt is taken from Francis Dvornik, Byzantine missions among the Slavs. SS. Constantine-Cyril and Methodius (F. Dvornik, Byzantine missions among the Slavs – 6), pp. 189-192. The citations deal with the letter of Pope St. Stephen (Latin – Stephanus V, died September 14, 891) where he mentions that the Roman Church is the seat…

  • In this post I will be citing from the works of St. Epiphanius in respect to the eternal procession of the Holy Spirit from the Father and/through the Son. All emphasis will be mine.   44,3 I myself, therefore, do not worship anything that is inferior to the essence of God himself, since it is…

  • In this post I will be citing from the works of St. Cyril of Alexandria where this blessed saint spoke of the Spirit’s essential/natural procession from both the Father and the Son. All emphasis will be mine.   1.  That the Holy Spirit is naturally of God, and in the Son, and through Him and…

  • In this post I will share a few quotes from St. Gregory in respect to the Filioque, e.g., the Holy Spirit’s eternal procession from the Father by/through the Son. All emphasis will be mine.     Indeed, it would be a lengthy task to set out in detail from the Scriptures those constructions which are inexactly expressed,…

  • The extract is taken from St. Gregory Nazianzus’ Orations where he discusses the monarchy of the Father in respect to the Trinity. All emphasis will be mine. Oration 29    The Third Theological Oration.   On the Son.   I. This then is what might be said to cut short our opponents’ readiness to argue…

  • This comes from St. Gregory’s Oration 25. All emphasis will be mine. Define our piety by teaching the knowledge of: One God, unbegotten, the Father; and One begotten Lord, his Son, referred to as “God” when he is mentioned separately, but “Lord” when he is named together with the Father—the first on account of the [divine]…

  • What a rich and important topic. St. Irenaeus of Lyons stands as one of the most powerful early witnesses to the primacy of Rome, and his testimony deserves to be understood in full — both its weight and its context. 🏛️ St. Irenaeus of Lyons on the Papacy Who Was Irenaeus? St. Irenaeus (c. 130–202…

  • Free Grace Theology (FGT) — associated with figures like Zane Hodges and the Grace Evangelical Society claims to honor the Bible, but when held up to the full light of Scripture and Sacred Tradition, it falls short in several serious ways, and we’re going to prove it how it contradicts the Bible also! What Free…

  • This excerpt is taken from St. Athanasius who claims that the language adopted by Nicaea to describe the Son’s essential equality with the Father isn’t new but quite ancient, going back to at least 130 years earlier. Athanasius exposed the Arian heretics by appealing to an unbroken chain of Apostolic succession of Bishops to prove…

  • David Kimchi, also known as RaDaK, was a medieval rabbinic commentator and philosopher who lived from 1160–1235 AD. In this post I will quote from his commentary in regards to a few OT texts that are either Messianic or have a direct bearing on Christian exegesis of OT verses, such as Psalm 2:12. Radak on…

  • I share the following article on St. Maximus the Confessor from CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA: St. Maximus of Constantinople. St. Maximus of Constantinople Known as the Theologian and as Maximus Confessor, born at Constantinople about 580; died in exile 13 August, 662. He is one of the chief names in the Monothelite controversy one of the chief doctors of the theology of the Incarnation and of ascetic mysticism, and…

  • In this post I will be quoting from Catholic Commentary on Sacred Scripture: The Gospel of John, by Francis Martin and William M. Wright IV, published by BakerAcademic, a division of Baker Publishing Group, Grand Rapids, Michigan, and published in 2015. All emphasis will be mine. Authorship The Gospel does not explicitly name its author,…

  • Another Arian Bites the Dust According to John’s Gospel, the prophet Isaiah saw Jesus Christ in his prehuman existence as YHWH of Hosts seated on his heavenly throne: “Jesus replied, ‘The light is with you for a little while longer. Walk while you have the light, so that the darkness may not overtake you. The one who…

  • The land of Illyricum

  • In this post I will be looking at two OT texts, which the early Christians saw as foreshadowing Christ’s crucifixion. These early writers employed these particular verses as prophesying or prefiguring Christ’s death on a cross. First Prophecy I begin with the following reference from the Jeremiah: “and I am as a lamb or a…

  • In this article I will quote the relevant verses from both the Old and New Testaments where Israel is either said to be Sodom and Gomorrah, or even worse than them. I will further show how God also warns that Israel’s punishment will be much more severe and worse than that which he inflicted upon…

  • In this post I will be looking at two OT texts, which the early Christians saw as foreshadowing Christ’s crucifixion. These early writers employed these particular verses as prophesying or prefiguring Christ’s death on a cross.     First Prophecy   I begin with the following reference from the Jeremiah:   “and I am as…

  • I share some of the many statements from St. John Chrysostom, one of the greatest saints biblical exegetes of the Church, affirming the primacy of Peter. These citations attest that Chrysostom held to Peter being the Rock and Leaders of the universal Church, having been given a preeminence over the rest of the holy Apostles…

  • Muslim apologist Sami Zaatari has jumped on the so-called “Christian” unitarian bandwagon by rehashing the same old worn out arguments and objections of these heretics against the true historic Christian faith which is based on the accurate interpretation of the Holy Bible. In one of his articles, Zaatari appeals to the unitarian interpretation of Psalm…

  • Examining Psalm 110:1 A look at Its Implications on God being a Multi-Personal Being and upon the Deity of Christ Christians often appeal to Psalm 110:1 to prove that the Hebrew Bible teaches that Yahweh is multi-Personal, that there is more than one Person who is Yahweh God, and that the Messiah is God. The…

  • In this post I quote the commentary of Mar Ishodad of Merv (Mari Ishoʿdaḏ Maruzaya), who was the bishop of Hdatta (circa 850 AD), which is near current-day Mosul, Iraq. Ishodad is considered a very important and prominent theologian of the Assyrian Church of the East, who wrote some very influential commentaries on the Syriac version of the Holy…

  • The Relationship between God the Father, Son and Holy Spirit Now, having established that there is only ONE God but also that there are three persons who are shown to be this one God, we are faced with the question of how these three persons are ‘related’.  There have been different ‘models’ and ideas for…

  • Does the Bible Say, That the Holy Spirit Is God?  Before we look at the interrelationship of God, the Father, God, the Son, and God, the Holy Spirit, we have to quickly establish that the Holy Spirit is God. I think, if you could follow and accept the reasoning in the earlier parts, there should…

  • This lengthy extract from St. Optatus is taken from Optatus of Milevis, Against the Donatists (1917) Book 2. pp. 57-119. His statements affirm that the Roman Church is the See of Peter, and the grounds of unity which makes the Church one and universal. He further argues that to deviate or break communion from it is to…

  • The argument is: Arguments against Dyophysites: Premise 1) Ens and unum are strictly convertible; whatever is, is one, and whatever is one, is. Unity adds nothing positive to being, but is the privation of internal division Premise 2) Numerical unity is that mode of unity which is both undivided in itself and divided from every…

  • God’s Glory equated with His Praise and Honor Another indication that Jesus shares in the glory of God is that he receives the very honor and praise which only God is supposed to receive. According to the book of Isaiah, Yahweh says that he will not share his glory and praise with any other so-called…

  • It may surprise Christians to discover that Martin Luther candidly admitted that the Catholic Church traces itself back to the Apostles, that it genuinely has Apostolic Succession, despite having (in Luther’s erroneous view) corrupted itself throughout time. Here is Luther in his own words: Today the pope and his crowd cry out against us that…

  • The following quote is taken from Josephus’ The War of the Jews 5:5, translated by William Whiston. He states that the Divine Name consists of 4 vowels. All emphasis is mine. ז. ובני משפחת הכהֻנה, אשר לא יכלו לשָׁרֵת בקֹדש מפני מום אשר בבשרם, היו באים לפנים מן הקלעים עם אחיהם הכשרים ומקבלים את חלקי הזבחים…

  • In this post I will be quoting from two English translations of the Syriac translation of the Holy Bible, which is called the Peshitta. I cite this particular ancient version for the express purpose of showing that the Aramaic term for God, namely Alah/Alaha, is used for both the Father and the Son. I will also use…

  • The Aramaic Bible, commonly referred to as the Peshitta, employs a unique word MarYah, which some authorities believe is a compound phrase consisting of Aramaic Mar (“Lord”) and the shortened form of the Tetragrammaton or the divine name yod-heh-vav-heh, namely, Yah. If this is so then the term literally means “The Lord Yah,” or “The Lord Jehovah.”  What makes this all the…

The Christianization of the Shema

Introduction

If one were to ask for a passage which encapsulates the very essence of the OT Scriptures, as well as the heart of the Jewish faith, it would have to be the following reference which exhorts the Israelites to acknowledge and worship Yahweh alone as their God:

“Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God, the LORD is one (Shema Yisrael Yahweh Eloheinu Yahweh Echad). Love the LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength.” Deuteronomy 6:4-5

The confession that Yahweh is the only God that Israel must confess and fully love is commonly referred to as the Shema, which is the actual Hebrew word that starts off the verse.

Moreover, the Hebrews words, Yahweh Eloheinu Yahweh Echad, can be translated in various ways, such as the following:

The LORD our God is one LORD
The LORD is our God, the LORD is one
The LORD is our God, the LORD alone

However one chooses to render the Hebrew the point of the passage is clear: Israel is called to believe in and worship Yahweh as their only God. In fact, it is not an exaggeration to say that the Shema is the central pillar and foundation upon which the entire the OT is built. Everything hinges on Israel’s relationship to Yahweh as their only God and Savior.

In this article we are going to see how Jesus and his followers took the Shema and “Christianized” it in order to give us what some scholars have called “Christological monotheism.” We will see how Christ and his inspired Apostles redefined and expanded the Shema so as to include Jesus within the identity of the one true God.

Jesus and the Shema

When asked what the greatest or most important command was, the Lord Jesus mentioned the Shema as part of his reply:

“One of the teachers of the law came and heard them debating. Noticing that Jesus had given them a good answer, he asked him, ‘Of all the commandments, which is the most important?’ ‘The most important one,’ answered Jesus, ‘is this: “Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one (kyrios ho theos hemon kyrios heis). Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind and with all your strength.” The second is this: “Love your neighbor as yourself.” There is no commandment greater than these.’ ‘Well said, teacher,’ the man replied. ‘You are right in saying that God is one and there is no other but him. To love him with all your heart, with all your understanding and with all your strength, and to love your neighbor as yourself is more important than all burnt offerings and sacrifices.’ When Jesus saw that he had answered wisely, he said to him, ‘You are not far from the kingdom of God.’ And from then on no one dared ask him any more questions.” Mark 12:28-34

However, Jesus didn’t stop there but went on to quote Psalm 110:1 immediately afterwards:

“While Jesus was teaching in the temple courts, he asked, ‘Why do the teachers of the law say that the Messiah is the son of David? David himself, speaking by the Holy Spirit, declared: “The Lord said to my Lord (kyrios to kyrio mou): ‘Sit at my right hand until I put your enemies under your feet.’” David himself calls him ‘Lord’ (kyrion). How then can he be his son?’ The large crowd listened to him with delight.” Mark 12:35-37

Here, Jesus quotes Psalm 110:1 to show how David was inspired by the Holy Spirit to call the Messiah his Lord. What makes this Psalm rather interesting is that it records the invitation of the Lord (Yahweh) to David’s Lord (the Messiah) to sit at Yahweh’s right hand as both King and Priest until the time when the Messiah subdues and vanquishes all his enemies:

“The LORD says to my lord: ‘Sit at my right hand until I make your enemies a footstool for your feet.’ The LORD will extend your mighty scepter from Zion, saying, ‘Rule in the midst of your enemies!’ Your troops will be willing on your day of battle. Arrayed in holy splendor, your young men will come to you like dew from the morning’s womb. The LORD has sworn and will not change his mind: ‘You are a priest forever, in the order of Melchizedek.’ The Lord is at your right hand; he will crush kings on the day of his wrath. He will judge the nations, heaping up the dead and crushing the rulers of the whole earth. He will drink from a brook along the way, and so he will lift his head high.” Psalm 110:1-7

Thus, since the Shema required all the faithful Israelites to adore and worship only one Lord, namely Yahweh, this meant that David, who was an Israelite himself, had to acknowledge that there is only one Lord worthy of divine honors and worship. Yet Psalm 110 shows that David also knew by inspiration from the Holy Spirit that the Messiah was his Lord as well.

Moreover, to be seated at God’s right hand basically means that the Messiah (and therefore Jesus) sits on God’s very own throne and therefore shares in God’s sovereign rule over all creation:

“She gave birth to a son, a male child, who ‘will rule all the nations with an iron scepter.’ And her child was snatched up to God and to his throne… Then I heard a loud voice in heaven say: ‘Now have come the salvation and the power and the kingdom of our God, and the authority of his Messiah. For the accuser of our brothers and sisters, who accuses them before our God day and night, has been hurled down.’” Revelation 12:5, 10

As such, the entire creation is subject to Christ’s supreme authority:

“and his incomparably great power for us who believe. That power is the same as the mighty strength he exerted when he raised Christ from the dead and seated him at his right hand in the heavenly realms, far above all rule and authority, power and dominion, and every name that is invoked, not only in the present age but also in the one to come. And God placed all things under his feet and appointed him to be head over everything for the church, which is his body, the fullness of him who fills everything in every way.” Ephesians 1:19-23

“But our citizenship is in heaven. And we eagerly await a Savior from there, the Lord Jesus Christ, who, by the power that enables him to bring everything under his control, will transform our lowly bodies so that they will be like his glorious body.” Philippians 3:20-21

“For in Christ all the fullness of the Deity lives in bodily form, and in Christ you have been brought to fullness. He is the head over every power and authority… Since, then, you have been raised with Christ, set your hearts on things above, where Christ is, seated at the right hand of God.” Colossians 2:9-10, 3:1

“… It saves you by the resurrection of Jesus Christ, who has gone into heaven and is at God’s right hand—with angels, authorities and powers in submission to him.” 1 Peter 3:21b-22

This is why Christ is called King of all kings and Lord over every other lord and ruler since he has absolute power over every created thing:

“I charge you in the presence of God, who gives life to all things, and of Christ Jesus, who testified the good confession before Pontius Pilate, that you keep the commandment without stain or reproach until the appearing of our Lord Jesus Christ, which Hewill bring about at the proper time — He who is the blessed and only Sovereign, the King of kings and Lord of lords, who alone possesses immortality and dwells in unapproachable light, whom no man has seen or can see To Him be honor and eternal dominion! Amen.” 1 Timothy 6:13-16 NASB

“and from Jesus Christ, who is the faithful witness, the firstborn from the dead, and the ruler of the kings of the earth. To him who loves us and has freed us from our sins by his blood, and has made us to be a kingdom and priests to serve his God and Father—to him be glory and power for ever and ever! Amen.” Revelation 1:5-6

“They will wage war against the Lamb, but the Lamb will triumph over them BECAUSE he is Lord of lords and King of kings—and with him will be his called, chosen and faithful followers.” Revelation 17:14 – cf. 19:16

Amazingly, it is Yahweh who is actually said to be the Lord of lords according to the prophetic writings:

“For the LORD your God is God of gods and Lord of lords, the great God, mighty and awesome, who shows no partiality and accepts no bribes.” Deuteronomy 10:17

“Give thanks to the LORD, for he is good. His love endures forever. Give thanks to the God of gods. His love endures forever. Give thanks to the Lord of lords: His love endures forever.” Psalm 136:1-3

Since there cannot be two Lord of lords or King of kings this means that the only way for Yahweh and Jesus to both be called the Lord of lords is if Jesus is actually Yahweh God (even though he is not the Father or the Holy Spirit). Notice how this works out logically:

  1. Yahweh is the Lord of lords according to the OT writings.
  2. The NT Scriptures affirm that Jesus is actually the Lord of lords.
  3. Therefore, since there can only be one Lord of lords this means that Jesus is Yahweh God.

That Jesus is Yahweh (yet not the Father or the Holy Spirit) can be further seen from the fact that one of the essential, defining characteristics which differentiated Yahweh from all created reality was/is his role as sovereign Ruler over the entire creation. Noted NT scholar Richard Bauckham explains:

3.4. Conclusion

In Second Temple Judaism, then, the throne of God in the highest heaven became a key symbol of monotheism, representative of one of the essential characteristics definitive of the divine identity. While a few traces of other enthroned figures associated with God’s rule can be found, the subordination of such figure to God’s rule is almost always stressed, while the overwhelming trend of the literature is towards emptying heaven of all thrones except God’s. There is no indication that this was controverted issue, as it was later in rabbinic discussions of Daniel 7:9 and of Metatron. The uniqueness of the heavenly throne of God belongs to the logic of the monotheism that dominated common Judaism in the Second Temple period. 

(Bauckham, Jesus and the God of Israel – God Crucified and Other Studies on the New Testament’s Christology of Divine Identity [William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, Grand Rapids, MI/ Cambridge, U.K. 2008], 5. The Throne of God and the Worship of Jesus, 3. The Heavenly Throne of God, p. 164; underline emphasis ours)

And:

The symbolic function of the unique divine throne is such that, if we find a figure distinguishable from God seated on God’s throne itself, we should see that as one of Judaism’s most potent theological means of including such a figure in the unique divine identity…

35. So, rightly, Gieschen, Angelomorphic Christology, 93-4: ‘Texts in which a figure shares the divine throne with God, or is its sole occupant, make a profound theological statement in a Jewish context: divinity could be ascribed to the enthroned figure.’ I would say: ‘divinity must be ascribed to the enthroned figure.’ 

(Ibid., p. 165; bold emphasis ours)

Hence, for Jesus to share in Yahweh’s unique rule over all created reality meant that Christ (as well as his followers) viewed himself as an integral part of Yahweh’s divine identity. Jesus was clearly placing himself on the Creator side of the Creator-creature divide:

5.3. Divine sovereignty over all things

That it is on God’s own heavenly throne itself, the throne of glory, that Jesus sits beside God is explicit in some of the texts (Heb. 8:1; 12:2; Rev. 3:21; 5:6; 7:17; 22:3) and should probably be assumed for all. Partly with the exegetical help of Psalm 8:6, this participation in God’s cosmic rule is frequently expressed by the formulae ‘all things’ or ‘heaven and earth’ (or fuller cosmic formulae) or, for emphasis, both. This language, constantly used of God’s relationship with his creation in Second Temple Jewish texts, is significant BECAUSE IT IS THE WAY THAT JEWISH MONOTHEISM DISTINGUISHES GOD FROM ALL OTHER REALITY (‘all things’), AS CREATOR AND RULER OF ALL. By including Jesus in the full cosmic scope of God’s sovereignty, New Testament terminology places Jesus CLEARLY ON THE DIVINE SIDE OF THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN GOD AND ‘ALL THINGS.’ While Daniel 7:14 and Psalm 2:8 provided the basis for thinking of a universal rule on earth of the Messiah (Sib. Or. 5:416; 1 En. 62:6), it is the cosmic scope of Christ’s sovereignty which places it in that unique category which his enthronement on the divine throne in the highest heaven symbolizes. OF NO PRINCIPAL ANGEL OR EXALTED HUMAN IN SECOND TEMPLE JEWISH TEXTS IS IT SAID THAT HE HAS AUTHORITY OVER ALL THINGS OR OVER HEAVEN AND EARTH.

Another way in which the fully cosmic rule of the exalted Christ is stressed is by reference to the subjection of all the heavenly powers to him. The texts portray the submission both of the rebellious angelic powers (1 Cor. 15:24-28; Ascen. Isa. 11:23) and of the obedient ones (Eph. 1:20-21; 1 Pet. 3:22; Ascen. Isa. 11:24-32; cf. Rev. 5:11-14; Ep. Apos. 3). It is noteworthy that specific ranks of angels are those in high authority in the heavens: ‘principalities’ (archai: 1 Cor. 15:24; Eph. 1:21), ‘authorities’ (exousiai: 1 Cor. 15:24; Eph. 1:21; 1 Pet. 3:22), ‘powers’ (dunameis: Eph. 1:21; 1 Peter 3:22) and ‘dominions’ (kuriotetes: Eph. 1:21). 

(Ibid., pp. 176-177; capital emphasis ours)

It is therefore no coincidence that the Lord quoted Psalm 110:1 right after having just finished reciting the Shema. It is apparent that Christ wanted to show that even the OT prophets and saints knew that the one Lord whom they served and worshiped is not a singular divine Person. Jesus used Psalm 110 to prove that the Messiah is included within the divine identity of Israel’s one Lord, thereby establishing that the Lord God whom Israel confessed is actually multi-personal in nature.

Nor is this the only time or place where Jesus made reference or alluded to the Shema. He does so again in this next passage:

“My sheep listen to my voice; I know them, and they follow me. I give them eternal life, and they shall never perish; no one will snatch them out of my hand. My Father, who has given them to me, is greater than all; no one can snatch them out of my Father’s hand. I and the Father are one (hen esmen, lit. “one we are”).’ Again his Jewish opponents picked up stones to stone him, but Jesus said to them, ‘I have shown you many good works from the Father. For which of these do you stone me?’ ‘We are not stoning you for any good work,’ they replied, ‘but for blasphemy, because you, a mere man, claim to be God.’” John 10:27-33

In this particular reference Jesus claims to be one with the Father in the context of claiming certain divine roles and prerogatives which the OT says only Yahweh assumes and is capable of doing.

For instance, Jesus clearly states that true believers are his sheep whom he preserves by his hand, i.e. his sovereign power, and who hear his voice. However, according to the prophetic writings the sheep are actually the flock of Yahweh’s hand and are therefore expected to obey his voice:

“Come, let us worship and bow down, Let us kneel before the LORD our Maker. For He is our God, And we are the people of His pasture and the sheep of His hand Today, if you would hear His voice, Do not harden your hearts, as at Meribah, As in the day of Massah in the wilderness,” Psalm 95:6-8 NASB

Jesus further claims to be able to give all true believers eternal life and insures that no one will ever be able to snatch them from his sovereign hand of protection. Jesus says the same thing about the Father, e.g. no one is able to snatch the sheep out of the Father’s hand either since both the Father and the Son are one. It is obvious that the unity that the Father and Son share is in their ability to perfectly preserve believers for all eternity.

In other words, Jesus is affirming that he is all-powerful just like the Father is. Otherwise, Christ wouldn’t be able to give eternal life to all his followers or guarantee that no one would ever be able to snatch them out of his care and preservation. And since this is a power which only God possesses it is therefore clear that Jesus is claiming to be one with the Father in essence.

It is also clear that Jesus is again ascribing to himself the ability and functions which the OT says belong to Yahweh alone. In fact, Jesus is actually employing the language of specific OT texts which go out of their way to affirm that Yahweh is the one and only God who can save and preserve believers!

For instance, compare Jesus’ words with the following passages:

“See now that I myself am he! There is no god besides me. I put to death and I bring to life, I have wounded and I will heal, and no one can deliver out of my hand.” Deuteronomy 32:39

“There is no one holy like the LORD; there is no one besides you; there is no Rock like our God… The LORD brings death and makes alive; he brings down to the grave and raises up.” 1 Samuel 2:2, 6

Interestingly, Jesus taught that he would be the One who would actually raise people from the dead, from out of their graves, at the last day!

“Very truly I tell you, a time is coming and has now come when the dead will hear THE VOICE OF THE SON OF GODand those who hear will live… Do not be amazed at this, for a time is coming when all who are in their graves will hear HIS VOICE and come out—those who have done what is good will rise to live, and those who have done what is evil will rise to be condemned.” John 5:25, 28-29

“‘For I have come down from heaven not to do my will but to do the will of him who sent me. And this is the will of him who sent me, that I shall lose none of all those he has given me,but raise them up at the last day. For my Father’s will is that everyone who looks to the Son and believes in him shall have eternal life, and I will raise them up at the last day.’ At this the Jews there began to grumble about him because he said, ‘I am the bread that came down from heaven.’ They said, “Is this not Jesus, the son of Joseph, whose father and mother we know? How can he now say, ‘I came down from heaven”?’ Stop grumbling among yourselves,’ Jesus answered. ‘No one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws them, and I will raise them up at the last day… Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise them up at the last day.’” John 6:38-43, 54

We now turn to our final OT text:

“‘You are my witnesses,’ declares the LORD, ‘and my servant whom I have chosen, so that you may know and believe me and understand that I am he. Before me no god was formed, nor will there be one after me. I, even I, am the LORD, and apart from me there is no savior. I have revealed and saved and proclaimed — I, and not some foreign god among you. You are my witnesses,’ declares the LORD, ‘that I am God. Yes, and from ancient days I am he. No one can deliver out of my hand. When I act, who can reverse it?’” Isaiah 43:10-13

All of these verses affirm that Yahweh is the only God who can save and preserve his people. They also confirm that Yahweh is the only God there is who can heal and give life or cause sickness and death. These specific functions require Yahweh to be omnipotent, otherwise he would not be able to give life or cause death etc. This also explains why none can deliver out of his mighty hand of power since there is no one in all creation who is anywhere near as powerful as Yahweh is.

In light of the foregoing it is apparent that Jesus has once again taken the Shema (along with some other OT monotheistic texts) and expanded it to include himself (along with the Father) within the identity of the one true God of Israel.

It is now time to examine what the blessed and holy Apostle Paul had to say about this same issue.

Paul and the Shema

The Apostle Paul, writing to the Corinthians around 55 AD, reminded them that all knowledgeable believers readily confessed and acknowledged that there is only one God and Lord:

“So then, about eating food sacrificed to idols: We know that ‘An idol is nothing at all in the world’ and that ‘There is no God but one.’ For even if there are so-called gods, whether in heaven or on earth (as indeed there are many ‘gods’ and many ‘lords’), yet for us there is but one God, the Father, from whom all things came and for whom we live; and there is but one Lord, Jesus Christ, through whom all things came (di’ hou ta panta) and through whom (di’ autou) we live.” 1 Corinthians 8:4-6

NT scholars basically agree that 1 Corinthians 8:6 is an early creedal statement which all true Christians were expected to affirm.

8:5-6 While there is disagreement over whether all of this verse is from Paul or whether most of it is from the Corinthians, it seems best to take it as Paul’s own confession in which he expands on the points made by the Corinthians. Verse 6 also has a creedal sound to it (and it is set off in poetic form in NA27), leading many to believe that Paul is citing (or slightly modifying) creedal material from the early church. Wright is not exaggerating when he asserts that the writing of this text ranks as “one of the greatest pioneering moments in the entire history of Christology.” We do not know whether Paul wrote this beautifully crisp and profound text or if it existed in some form before the writing of this letter. The text is so theologically profound and so perfectly fits Paul’s argument here and his theology and expression as found elsewhere in his writings that we are inclined to think that he wrote it himself. Paul does not actually qualify the Corinthians’ statements but rather is “engaging in the twofold task of building rapport and anticipating objections.”

(Roy E. Ciampa & Brian S. Rosner, The First Letter to the Corinthians (The Pillar New Testament Commentary), D. A. Carson (general editor) [William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, Grand Rapids, MI 2010], pp. 380-381; italic emphasis ours)

The consensus of NT scholarship further accepts that this confession is actually an adaptation or a Christianization of the Shema:

“Since Paul has already referred to the things worshiped by others as so-called gods in v. 5a, it seems appropriate to place gods and lords in quotation marks in v. 5b, as do the NIV, TNIV, ESV, and other interpreters. Paul affirms that there are many entities in the world referred to as gods or lords, without suggesting that they are what people suppose them to be (as made clear by v. 6). The language of Deuteronomy 6:4 (‘the LORD our God, the LORD is one’) has governed Paul’s wording and argument in these verses…” 

(Ibid., p. 381; bold emphasis ours)

Paul has basically taken over and adapted the language of the Shema so as to include Jesus within the identity of the one true God of Israel!

“While the rest of the world may be enamored with a multitude of gods and lords, for us, that is, for all those who have the knowledge common to all Christians (vv. 1, 4), things are different. The key words of v. 6, ‘Lord,’ ‘God,’ and ‘one,’ are taken from Deuteronomy 6:4 (‘the LORD our God, the LORD is one’), in which Lord and God both refer to the same (one) God. Here Paul ‘has glossed “God” with “the Father,” and “Lord” with “Jesus Christ,” adding in each case an explanatory phrase: “God” is the Father, “from whom are all things and we to him,” and the “Lord” is Jesus the Messiah, “through whom are all things and we through him.”’ Paul thus simultaneously reaffirms Jewish monotheism and THE HIGHEST POSSIBLE CHRISTOLOGY IMAGINABLE. Christ finds his identity within the very definition of that one God/Lord of Israel…

“The statement of the unique lordship of Jesus Christ is central to Paul’s theology in general and to this letter in particular. The ‘christological monotheism’ affirmed here distinguishes the Christian community from both non-Christian Judaism and Gentile paganism. Jewish monotheism is affirmed against all forms of pagan polytheism or (atheism), while, against non-Christian Judaism, Christ is understood to participate in God’s identity.” 

(Ibid., pp. 383-384; bold and capital emphasis ours)

The blessed Apostle was essentially calling the faithful to give the same allegiance and undivided devotion to the Father and the Son that the Shema required the Jews to show to Yahweh their God:

“It is notable that Paul’s christological modification of the Shema comes in a passage where he hopes his statement might fulfill the very same roles that the Shema did in Judaism. The Shema was important both for its theological affirmation and its sociological function. Early Judaism rallied around the one God who had redeemed them, and their allegiance to that one God is reflected in their worship of him and rejection of all other claims to deity. If the Corinthians would rally together in loyalty to God the Father and the Lord Jesus Christ, giving Christ the priority that they had been giving their own agendas, it would go a long way toward promoting unity within the Corinthian congregation and toward maintaining a distinct identity in contrast to the pagan environment. The deity of Christ may not be his main point, but his incorporation of Christ the Lord into the very definition of the God of Israel is consistent with the central role that Christ held in the worship and theology of the early church.” 

(Ibid., p. 382; bold emphasis ours)

What’s more, Paul doesn’t simply include Jesus within Yahweh’s unique divine identity. He even goes so far as to ascribe to Christ the very roles of creation and salvation which both the inspired OT writings and the Apocrypha attribute to Yahweh and his divine Wisdom:

“The roles attributed to the Father and to Christ in creation (from whom and through whom) reflect traditional biblical and Jewish affirmations of the role of God and of Wisdom (for the latter see Prov. 8:22-31; Wis. 9:4, 9; Philo, On Flight and Finding, 109). According to the prophets, Yahweh’s absolute power as creator of heaven and earth is what sets him apart from the idols (which are human creations; see, e.g., Jer. 10:3-16; Isa. 44:9-24). The description of Christ in terms normally attributed to Wisdom (Wis. 8:1-6; 9:1-2, 9; Sir. 24) suggests that just as Jesus takes the place of ‘the Lord’ in the Shema he also takes the place of ‘Wisdom’ within Hellenistic Judaism. As Wright asserts, ‘Paul has indicated that everything one might hope to gain through possessing [Wisdom] can be gained rather by possessing Christ.’” 

(Ibid., p. 384; bold emphasis ours)

And:

“The relationship between the last clause of v. 6 and the first half of the verse (about God the Father) challenges interpreters. The earliest part of the verse affirmed that all things came into existence through Christ. It would be redundant to say we also came into existence through Christ since we were already included in ‘everything.’ Paul is probably highlighting Christ’s role in both creation and our participation in new creation (i.e., ‘all creation has come into being through him and our experience of the new creation was through him as well’). In this way both statements about Christ may be understood as coming logically between the two affirmations made about the Father. Thiselton, quoting Langkammer, puts it this way: ‘“Paul is the first to outline a sketch of a formal link between Protology [cosmology] and soteriology” which proclaims before the community “God the Father, the originating Ground of all and the end-goal,” alongside “the one Lord, the Mediator of the first creation and the Mediator of the reality of salvation.”’ This suggests a pervasive ‘sense of movement “from … through … to.”’ Christ is understood to be the means of accomplishing all of the Father’s intentions for his creation.

“Paul’s statement puts emphasis on the first-person plural personal pronoun throughout this verse (but for us … and we … and we). He thus stresses the unique covenantal relationship between all Christians and the God who created the universe (in contrast with the delusions of the pagan world). We know the truth of one God and one Lord. We know that all creation comes from the Father and that he is the reason and goal of our existence. We know the Lord Jesus, the agent of all creation and the one to whom our new existence is due as well. The structure of the text implies both a relationship and a contrast between us and the rest of creation. All of creation originated with the Father through the Son. We are a part of that creation, and our existence comes from the Father through the Son as well. But both this text and its context highlight a contrast between Christians and the non-Christian world. For them there are many ‘gods’ and many ‘lords,’ but for us there is only one God and one Lord. They are part of God’s creation, but we represent the restoration, renewal, and destiny of God’s creation, his new creation (cf. 2 Cor. 5:17), which is accomplished through Christ.” 

(Ibid., pp. 384-385; bold emphasis ours)

67. N. T. Wright, “Monotheism,” 130. Contra James D. G. Dunn, Christology in the Making (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1996), 182-183, the preexistence of Christ is presupposed in both his identification with the “Lord” in the Shema and his identification with the role of Wisdom which was present at the time of creation. 

(Ibid., p. 384)

This isn’t the only place in Paul’s writings where Christ is said to be the Agent and Sustainer of creation, the One through and for whom all things were created and exist.

“The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him (en auto) all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him (di’ autou) and FOR him (eis auton). He IS before all things, and in him (en auto) all things hold together.” Colossians 1:15-17

Amazingly, Paul uses the very same prepositions to describe the role of God (the Father) in creating and sustaining the entire cosmos, and his relationship to all of created reality (especially believers):

“The God who made the world and everything in it is the Lord of heaven and earth and does not live in temples built by hands. And he is not served by human hands, as if he needed anything, because he himself gives all men life and breath and everything else. From one man he made every nation of men, that they should inhabit the whole earth; and he determined the times set for them and the exact places where they should live. God did this so that men would seek him and perhaps reach out for him and find him, though he is not far from each one of us. ‘For in him (en auto) we live and move and have our being.’ As some of your own poets have said, ‘We are his offspring.’” Acts 17:24-28

“For from him and through him and to (FOR) him are all things (hoti ex autou kai di’ autou kai eis auton ta panta). To him be the glory forever! Amen.” Romans 11:36

“There is one body and one Spirit — just as you were called to one hope when you were called — one Lord, one faith, one baptism; one God and Father of all, who is over all and through all and in all (epi panton kai dia panton kai en panton).” Ephesians 4:4-6

As if this wasn’t astonishing enough, according to the prophetic scriptures Yahweh created everything all alone, by himself:

“This is what the Lord says — your Redeemer, who formed you in the womb: I am the Lord, who has made all things, who ALONE stretched out the heavens, who spread out the earth BY MYSELF,” Isaiah 44:24

“He ALONE stretches out the heavens and treads on the waves of the sea.” Job 9:8

“Thou art He, O Jehovah, Thyself—Thou hast made the heavens, the heavens of the heavens, and all their host, the earth and all that are on it, the seas and all that are in them, and Thou art keeping all of them alive, and the host of the heavens to Thee are bowing themselves.” Nehemiah 9:6Young’s Literal Translation

Nehemiah’s statement that Yahweh keeps all creation alive refers to Yahweh’s role in sustaining or preserving all creation. This is brought out clearly in the following translation:

“And Ezra said: ‘Thou art the Lord, thou alone; thou hast made heaven, the heaven of heavens, with all their host, the earth and all that is on it, the seas and all that is in them; and thou preservest all of them; and the host of heaven worships thee.’” Nehemiah 9:6

The prophetic writings further attest that Yahweh created all things, especially his people Israel, for himself, for his own glory. Yahweh did not create for the glory of another:

“I will say to the north, ‘Give them up!’ and to the south, ‘Do not hold them back.’ Bring my sons from afar and my daughters from the ends of the earth—everyone who is called by my name, whom I created for my glory, whom I formed and made.” Isaiah 43:6-7

“The wild animals honor me, the jackals and the owls, because I provide water in the wilderness and streams in the wasteland, to give drink to my people, my chosen, the people I formed FOR myself that they may proclaim my praise.” Isaiah 43:20-21

When we combine all of the data together the conclusion is that Israel’s one God exists as a plurality of Divine Persons which includes the Persons of the Father and the Son:

  1. Yahweh is Israel’s only Lord God.
  2. Yahweh also made and sustains all creation by himself.
  3. Jesus is the one Lord of all creation, especially of believers.
  4. The Lord Jesus also made and sustains all creation.
  5. Jesus is, therefore, Yahweh God.
  6. However, the Father is also said to be Yahweh God.
  7. Moreover, Jesus is not the Father.
  8. This means that both the Father and the Son are Yahweh, the one true God of all creation.
  9. This, therefore, establishes that Yahweh is not a singular divine Person. According to the God-breathed Scriptures, Yahweh is actually an eternal Being who is multi-Personal in nature.

Concluding Remarks

In this article we examined how the inspired Christian Greek Scriptures utilized the Shema, the confession of faith that Yahweh alone is Israel’s God and their Lord whom they were expected to love unconditionally. Our analysis showed that both the Lord Jesus Christ and his emissaries did not interpret this OT creed along unitarian lines, i.e., neither the Lord Jesus nor the Apostles understood that this statement of faith meant that one had to believe and confess that Yahweh is a singular divine Person.

Both Christ and his followers took the Shemaand Christianized it, thereby giving us Christological monotheism. According to Jesus and his inspired spokespersons, Christ is included within the divine identity of the God of Israel so that the Father and the Son together (along with their eternal Spirit) are the Lord God which the Shema professes.

Therefore, the faithful are supposed to interpret and understand the Shema in the following manner:

“Hear O Israel: the LORD (Jesus) our God (the Father), the LORD (Jesus) is one.”

In other words, “the LORD” = Jesus whereas “our God” = Father.

In light of the foregoing can there be any doubt left concerning what the Lord Jesus and the very first Christians actually taught and believed about God and Christ? Can anyone deny that Christ and the Apostles proclaimed that Jesus is included within the divine identity of Yahweh as the unique Son of God?

To those who, by the grace of our sovereign Triune God, have eyes to see and ears to hear there is absolutely no doubt concerning the true identity of the risen and exalted Christ:

Jesus Christ is Yahweh to the glory of God the Father!


Unless noted otherwise, all scriptural quotations were taken from the 2011 edition of the New International Version (NIV) of the Holy Bible.


Comments

Leave a comment